Skip to main content

Regime Change Is Only Way to Stop Iran Proxies in Iraq

Regime Change Is Only Way to Stop Iran Proxies in Iraq
Saturday, 24 February 2018 07:57



NCRI Staff

NCRI - When Iraqi Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani issued a fatwa calling on all able-bodied Iraqis to defend their country against ISIS, a 100,000-strong fighting force, known as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), emerged.

The PMF was made up of multiple volunteer Shiite militia groups that filled the void left by the collapsed Iraqi army, but some of these groups hid a dangerous sponsor: Iran.

While all PMF militias are technically under Iraqi control, those Iran-aligned groups still answer to the Iranian Regime and, as such, have done real damage to the safety and security of Iraq in order to expand Iranian influence in the country.

In fact, the Iran-backed PMF forces, who have been working in Iraq since the fall of the Baath regime, may even have been responsible for sectarian atrocities that laid the groundwork for ISIS and the 2006 war between Arab Sunnis and Shiites. They have violently resisted any attempt to disarm them by Iraq and the United States.

Since the fatwa, these Iran-backed militias have exploited the security problems (ISIS, the collapse of the Iraqi army) to consolidate their hold on power and expand Iran’s influence. Worse still, they may even be able to get actual political power in the upcoming Iraqi elections, as Iran proxies like Hezbollah in Lebanon have previously done.

Given that the Iraqi army is now rebuilt and ISIS is gone, many expected that the PMF would dissipate, but the truth is that Sistani cannot simply dismantle the PMF, which provides a livelihood to the fighters not under Iranian control, as it would cause a public backlash and undermine the government.

He is also unable to take on Iran’s proxies alone – even the US failed there- but at the same time the Iranian militias cannot be left to their own devices. No doubt, they will exacerbate sectarian tensions to the point that ISIS resurges.

So what can be done?

Well, Ranj Alaaldin, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Doha Center, wrote on The Atlantic that Sistani should work with other anti-Iran voices in Iraq, like Muqtada al-Sadr, other regional powers, and the United States to contain Iran’s proxies, rebuild Iraq, and reshape Iraq’s political system.

However, the real answer is that the Iranian Regime will not simply give in at the first signs of opposition. The mullahs have proven time and time again that they will continue their malign behaviour no matter what, so the only way to stop them is through supporting regime change in Iran.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WE SHOULD LISTEN CLOSELY TO IRAN Created: 26 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Human rights Protests United States Opinion JCPOA Paris Middle East Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei (Photo by Supreme Leader Press Office / Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) By Heshmat Alavi As the world continues to debate the recent Iranian outburst of protests, its "lack of leadership" as they claim, and the road ahead, there is no doubt in the minds of senior Iranian regime officials over who led, and continues to lead, this latest uprising that continues to rattle the very pillars of the mullahs' rule.Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made his thoughts crystal clear.“The incidents were organized” and carried out by the Iranian opposition People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), he said although using a different term. “The [MEK] had prepared for this months ago” and “the [MEK’s] media outlets had called for it.” The MEK is best known ...
THE MAGAZINE: From the August 21 Issue Tortured by 'Moderates' Iran's dissidents deserve a hearing AUG 21, 2017 | By KELLY JANE TORRANCE Shabnam Madadzadeh, her brother Farzad, and Arash Mohammadi. Photo credit: KELLY JANE TORRANCE / THE WEEKLY STANDARD Hassan Rouhani was sworn in for his second term as president of Iran on August 5, surrounded by fresh flowers, fervent followers, and around 500 foreign officials. Representatives of the United Kingdom, France, the United Nations, and the Vatican rubbed shoulders with the Syrian prime minister, Hezbollah second-in-command Naim Qassem, Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader and FBI Most Wanted Terrorists list member Ramadan Abdullah Shallah, and murderous Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe. The Westerners didn’t seem uncomfortable in such company; indeed, European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini was described as the star of the show after Iranian members of parliament elbowed through the crowd to take selfies with the...
IRAN REGIME IS SCARED OF LOSING EUROPE TO THE US OVER NUCLEAR DEAL Created: 20 January 2018 Iran NCRI Europe Extremism Nuclear JCPOA Iran Deal Weapons SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN violation of UN Security Council Resolution The Iranian Regime is becoming increasing scared of Donald Trump’s words and actions regarding the future of the nuclear deal and of Europe lack of opposition to Trump.Last week, Trump gave the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) one last chance, announcing that ifthe deal had not been sufficiently amended by May, he would withdraw the US from it.Trump wants to ensure that “Iran never even comes close to possessing a nuclear weapon, ” by increasing inspections, eliminating the current expiration dates, and adding Iran’s ballistic missile program into the deal. In order to make amendments to the deal, the US will have to get Europe on board as well and the Iranian Regime is not happy that Europe hasn’t said no.