Skip to main content

Perpetrators of crimes against humanity should be held accountable


Dr. Majid Rafizadeh | Published — Thursday 7 December 2017
Perpetrators of crimes against humanity should be held accountable
While the international media is focusing on the Houthis’ assassination of Yemen’s former President, Ali Abdullah Saleh, this week, little or no attention has been given to whether or not Iran played a role.
It is important to point out that any strategically or politically critical move conducted by Iran’s proxies and militia groups requires prior approval from Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, the senior commanders of the revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), such as Mohammed Ali Jafari, or top generals from the Quds Force including Qasem Soleimani.
In addition, if it were not for the Iranian regime’s financial support, military intelligence, training, logistical and advisory assistances, the Houthis would not have been empowered to such a level. In other words, the Houthis are fortunate to have the backing of the Iranian regime, which has not let them run out of ammunition in the three-year-old and seemingly intractable conflict in Yemen.
Iran continues to smuggle illicit weapons and technology into Yemen, with the IRGC reportedly now using a new route across the Gulf to get covert arms shipments to the Houthis.More broadly, this gives an insight into the tactics and long-term strategies of Iranian-trained and armed proxies across the Middle East, which are anchored in four pillars: Destabilization, conflict, assassination, and rejection of any solution that has international legitimacy.
The Iranian regime is comfortable with, and has become masterful in, adopting long-term strategic concepts of ambiguity and deniability. By deploying militias, proxies and covert operations, it becomes difficult for the international community to directly point the finger at Tehran. After a while, Iran makes the international community get accustomed to its terrorism, breaches of international law, illicit activities and violence.
Iranian regime and its proxy militia in Yemen share a dangerous ideology that we need to take seriously from now on, because such episodes as the assassination of Saleh will not be their final iteration.
Dr. Majid RafizadehThe Iranian regime has a long history of deploying third parties to silence foreign adversaries, as well as influential Iranian dissidents living abroad, through threats and assassination. Recently, Lebanon’s Prime Minister Saad Hariri resigned in protest at Iran’s interference in Lebanon through Hezbollah, and he stated there was a plot to assassinate him, just like his father Rafik 12 years ago. According to the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, since the establishment of the Iranian regime, its senior leadership has been linked to at least 162 assassinations of people considered political opponents. These assassinations occurred in 19 countries across the world.
The detailed report indicates that: “The evidence makes it clear that the Iranian rulers not only approve of assassinations abroad and that they honor and reward the assassins, but that they themselves plan these kinds of assassinations against people who, for purely political reasons, become undesirable. For the sake of preserving their power, they are willing to liquidate their political opponents.”
Finally, the Iranian regime and the Houthis share a dangerous ideology that we need to take seriously from now on, because such episodes as the assassination of Saleh will not be their final iteration. The perpetrators of such crimes against humanity should be held accountable and brought to justice.
• Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist. He is a leading expert on Iran and US foreign policy, a businessman and president of the International American Council. He serves on the boards of the Harvard International Review, the Harvard International Relations Council and the US-Middle East Chamber for Commerce and Business. Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria05 March 2018 Iran Focus London, 05 Mar - The French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, has arrived in Iran to talk with the country's president Hassan Rouhani, Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and the Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, according to Iranian state TV. Talks are expected to focus on Iran’s involvement in the Syrian Civil war and Iran's ballistic missile program, which both Le Drian and French President Emmanuel Macron have criticized Iran's missile program in recent weeks, with Le Drian stating that Iran's ballistic missile capacity worried France “enormously". In response to Iranian claims that their ballistic missile program is peaceful, Le Drian said: "Having such tools is not uniquely defensive, given the distance they can reach." The French Foreign Ministry even issued a statement ahead of the trip, which said Le Drian ...
WE SHOULD LISTEN CLOSELY TO IRAN Created: 26 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Human rights Protests United States Opinion JCPOA Paris Middle East Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei (Photo by Supreme Leader Press Office / Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) By Heshmat Alavi As the world continues to debate the recent Iranian outburst of protests, its "lack of leadership" as they claim, and the road ahead, there is no doubt in the minds of senior Iranian regime officials over who led, and continues to lead, this latest uprising that continues to rattle the very pillars of the mullahs' rule.Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made his thoughts crystal clear.“The incidents were organized” and carried out by the Iranian opposition People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), he said although using a different term. “The [MEK] had prepared for this months ago” and “the [MEK’s] media outlets had called for it.” The MEK is best known ...
Let’s Get Real: There Are No ‘Moderates’ In Iran’s Government That U.S. intelligence agencies’ latest threat assessment views Iran’s leadership according to the moderate-hardliner split. That defies logic. By Ben Weingarten FEBRUARY 23, 2018 If Iran is the most prominent state sponsor of terrorism in the world, can its president be called a “centrist?” What about if under that president Iran has become the world’s leading executioner of all people per capita, and of women and children on an absolute basis? Does a president termed the “Diplomatic Sheikh,” a man who brags about deceiving the West in negotiations to buy time to advance Iran’s nuclear program; who describes such diplomatic engagement as “ jihad ;” and who calls for still more “ jihad and resistance ” against Israel while pointing 250,000 rockets at it , strike you as “centrist?” If that president served for 40 years at the highest levels of the Islamic revolutionary regime as the first official following the overthrow ...