Skip to main content
NCRI - The US has prevented the Iranian Regime from collaborating on a multibillion-dollar fusion experiment in France over fears that the Regime cannot be trusted.Although it has been expected for months that the Iranian Regime would be taking part in the ITER project in a limited capacity, the US has blockedthem through its seat on the governing council as Iran’s participation must be approved unanimously.
The ITER council will hold a meeting later this month to address the issue.
Many are wondering how this decision will impact on Iran’s role in the scientific studies that are in the works, like the Joint European Torus, the planned Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Germany, and the Iranian Light Source Facility.
However, the US has made the right decision. This scientific research should not be allowed to fall into the hands of a rogue and shadowy Regime that could use it for evil rather than for good.
Fears over Iran’s trustworthiness
In mid-October, Donald Trump decertified Iran’s compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal (also known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA), which was supposed the halt the Iranian Regime’s nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.
Trump said that Iran had routinely violated the spirit of the deal with its use of ballistic missiles, support for terrorism, and destabilisation of the Middle East.
If you can’t trust a Regime not to develop and use ballistic missiles (in violation of the UN resolution that surrounds the nuclear deal), then how can you trust them to collaborate on a major project without sabotaging it?
If you can’t trust them to simply halt work on their nuclear programme and abide by international inspections, how can you trust that they won’t use the knowledge gathered in this project to do harm?
US Congress to weigh in on Iran deal
Trump stated that the nuclear deal was not in the national security interests of the US and has given Congress 60 days to re-evaluate the deal, with the possibility of imposing new non-nuclear sanctions against the country, rolling back nuclear-related sanctions that were waived under the deal or renegotiating the deal altogether.
With the possibility that sanctions could be rolled back at any moment, it doesn’t make sense to embark on research with Iran. How would the project be affected if they had to end the partnership prematurely? Would the knowledge already gain be used against the other participants?
The US has made the right decision and its allies should recognise that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

19 Million Dollar Scam in Tehran Sparks Protests19 June 2018

19 Million Dollar Scam in Tehran Sparks Protests19 June 2018 Iran Focus London, 19 Jun - In the Gisha area, a builder pre-sold several housing units that were under construction to several people simultaneously. After issuing a tracking code, the builder fled with over 80 billion tomans (approximately 19 million USD). On Monday, June 18th, a group of the betrayed home buyers staged a protest against the million-dollar scam of the Gisha housing construction in Tehran, Iran. A protester spoke about the details of this million-dollar fraud. “The housing maker, who at the same time has two real estate consultant offices in the Gisha area, was abusing access to the information system of the real estate sales by tampering the postal code contained in tracking code system, issued multiple letter of credits with official code tracking codes for various units and presold each unit at the same time to several individuals.” He added, “These plundered buyers trusted the letter of credits which ...
WE SHOULD LISTEN CLOSELY TO IRAN Created: 26 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Human rights Protests United States Opinion JCPOA Paris Middle East Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei (Photo by Supreme Leader Press Office / Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) By Heshmat Alavi As the world continues to debate the recent Iranian outburst of protests, its "lack of leadership" as they claim, and the road ahead, there is no doubt in the minds of senior Iranian regime officials over who led, and continues to lead, this latest uprising that continues to rattle the very pillars of the mullahs' rule.Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made his thoughts crystal clear.“The incidents were organized” and carried out by the Iranian opposition People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), he said although using a different term. “The [MEK] had prepared for this months ago” and “the [MEK’s] media outlets had called for it.” The MEK is best known ...
THE MAGAZINE: From the August 21 Issue Tortured by 'Moderates' Iran's dissidents deserve a hearing AUG 21, 2017 | By KELLY JANE TORRANCE Shabnam Madadzadeh, her brother Farzad, and Arash Mohammadi. Photo credit: KELLY JANE TORRANCE / THE WEEKLY STANDARD Hassan Rouhani was sworn in for his second term as president of Iran on August 5, surrounded by fresh flowers, fervent followers, and around 500 foreign officials. Representatives of the United Kingdom, France, the United Nations, and the Vatican rubbed shoulders with the Syrian prime minister, Hezbollah second-in-command Naim Qassem, Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader and FBI Most Wanted Terrorists list member Ramadan Abdullah Shallah, and murderous Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe. The Westerners didn’t seem uncomfortable in such company; indeed, European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini was described as the star of the show after Iranian members of parliament elbowed through the crowd to take selfies with the...