Skip to main content

Iran’s dirty hands all over Al-Qaeda’s terror

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh | Published — Sunday 5 November 2017
Iran’s dirty hands all over Al-Qaeda’s terror
A trove of 470,000 documents released by the CIA has revealed close ties between Osama bin Laden, Al-Qaeda and the Iranian regime. Some policy analysts and scholars have been surprised. What should be surprising is that they do not appear to grasp the nature of the long and close relationship between Iran and Al-Qaeda. It is not a new phenomenon. The files confirm what has been known by several intelligence agencies, courts and experts for a long time.
Al-Qaeda and Iranian ties date from the early 1990s. The Iranian regime viewed Al-Qaeda through the prism of political opportunism. From the Iranian leaders’ perspective, Al-Qaeda was an invaluable non-state terrorist group that could accomplish Iran’s two main revolutionary principles — anti-Americanism and undermining Saudi Arabia’s interests in the region.

The Sunni-Shiite division between Al-Qaeda and the Iranian regime was never an issue for Iran as long as the terrorist group could help Tehran accomplish its revolutionary principles, destabilize the region, and achieve the mullahs’ regional ambitions.
In the early 1990s, Al-Qaeda was in desperate need of funds — and, more importantly, sophisticated tactical, technical, and militia training that would enable it to carry out large scale-terrorist attacks. Hezbollah had carried out attacks against American forces, such as the 1983 bombing of the US Marine base outside Beirut barracks, which killed 241 Americans. The US pulled out of Lebanon, which was viewed as a significant strategic victory for Iran and Hezbollah.
This is when the honeymoon between Al-Qaeda and Iran began. The convergence of interests led to the blossoming of ties. Iran struck a deal with Al-Qaeda and used Hezbollah to provide funds, arms and explosives. Soon, a meeting took place in Sudan between bin Laden and Imad Mughniyah, the Hezbollah security chief.
Bin Laden advised his followers to revere the Iranian regime, and he wrote that Iran was the “main artery for funds, personnel, and communication” for Al-Qaeda. Three of Iran’s institutions were also keys to assisting Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah — the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, its elite Quds Force and Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence, Etela’at.
Even the first federal indictments of Al-Qaeda under the Clinton administration stated: “Osama bin Laden, the defendant, and Al-Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in Sudan and with representatives of the government of Iran, and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah, for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States.”
Iran and Hezbollah’s sophisticated training of Al-Qaeda operatives was instrumental. In December 1992, Al-Qaeda carried out its first known terrorist attack, bombing the Gold Mohur hotel in Aden, Yemen. The following year it bombed the World Trade Center in New York.


Newly released documents showing the extent of the links between Osama bin Laden and Tehran are shocking, but no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention.

Arab NewsFor more sophisticated training, Al-Qaeda members traveled to Lebanon. According to the files, Iran offered Al-Qaeda fighters “money and arms and everything they need, and offered them training in Hezbollah camps in Lebanon, in return for striking American interests in Saudi Arabia.”
Al-Qaeda’s modus operandi was fully shaped by the Iranian regime and its proxy, Hezbollah. This included vehicle bombs, suicide bombs and multidimensional attacks simultaneously on several targets.
After acquiring the tactical, technical and bombing expertise, Al-Qaeda carried out its first large-scale attacks in August 1998 — truck bombs at US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, in which more than 200 people died. A US district court found that before Iran and Hezbollah’s training, Al-Qaeda “did not possess the technical expertise required to carry out the embassy bombings.” In fact, they were replicas of Hezbollah attacks in 1983.
Before the 9/11 attacks in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, the Iranian regime allowed Al-Qaeda operatives to cross through Iran without visas or passports. Robust evidence, including a federal court ruling, found that “Iran furnished material and direct support for the 9/11 terrorists.” Eight of the hijackers passed through Iran before coming to the US. Iran provided funds, logistical support and ammunition to Al-Qaeda leaders and sheltered several of its leaders in exchange for attacks on US interests. The Iranian regime continued to support Al-Qaeda in Iraq and other countries with the goal of pushing out forces that are rivals to Iran.
In addition, this alliance clearly explains why Al-Qaeda has never attacked Iran.
Iran and Al-Qaeda have been cooperating for almost three decades. The Iranian regime is the leading state sponsor of terrorism, and it funds, arms, and trains any terrorist group that advances the mullahs’ agenda. Iran should be held liable for terrorist attacks carried out by Al-Qaeda that resulted in thousands of innocent people losing their lives. The Iranian leaders who were engaged in these heinous acts should be brought to the International Criminal Court. The regime should be sanctioned and isolated. If it were not for Iran and Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda would have not had the chance to blossom and carry out its terrorist attacks.
• Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist. He is a leading expert on Iran and US foreign policy, a businessman and president of the International American Council. Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria05 March 2018 Iran Focus London, 05 Mar - The French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, has arrived in Iran to talk with the country's president Hassan Rouhani, Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and the Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, according to Iranian state TV. Talks are expected to focus on Iran’s involvement in the Syrian Civil war and Iran's ballistic missile program, which both Le Drian and French President Emmanuel Macron have criticized Iran's missile program in recent weeks, with Le Drian stating that Iran's ballistic missile capacity worried France “enormously". In response to Iranian claims that their ballistic missile program is peaceful, Le Drian said: "Having such tools is not uniquely defensive, given the distance they can reach." The French Foreign Ministry even issued a statement ahead of the trip, which said Le Drian ...
WE SHOULD LISTEN CLOSELY TO IRAN Created: 26 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Human rights Protests United States Opinion JCPOA Paris Middle East Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei (Photo by Supreme Leader Press Office / Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) By Heshmat Alavi As the world continues to debate the recent Iranian outburst of protests, its "lack of leadership" as they claim, and the road ahead, there is no doubt in the minds of senior Iranian regime officials over who led, and continues to lead, this latest uprising that continues to rattle the very pillars of the mullahs' rule.Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made his thoughts crystal clear.“The incidents were organized” and carried out by the Iranian opposition People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), he said although using a different term. “The [MEK] had prepared for this months ago” and “the [MEK’s] media outlets had called for it.” The MEK is best known ...
How years of increasing labor unrest signaled Iran’s latest protest wave 1/20/2018 11:00:45 AM Anti-government protests spread in Iran, garner U.S. praise By Kevan Harris and Zep Kalb Washington Post, January 19, 2018 - Beginning on Dec. 28, a wave of protests surged across Iran, with at least 75 cities reportedly experiencing one or more demonstrations in the first week. Soon after they began, commentators rushed to attribute the protests to various grievances, from Ponzi-like banking scheme collapses and budget corruption allegations to soaring prices of eggs and gasoline. However, our research suggests that rather than grievances alone, an underappreciated precursor for the protests was the buildup of demonstrations and rallies by teachers, workers, trade unions and civil society associations. Before the recent protests, we constructed a data set detailing labor unrest in Iran from 2012 to 2016. Using credible domestic newspapers that contained information on these demonstrations, ...