Skip to main content
DEMOCRATIC CHANGE IN IRAN IS WITHIN REACH Created: 12 November 2017
Iran
NCRI
PMOI/MEK
United States
Terrorism
IRGC

Hostage crisis anniversary reminder of need for change in Iran
By Ali Safavi
‘THE Hill. On Nov. 4, the Iranian regime commemorated the 38th anniversary of the U.S. Embassy takeover in 1979, when dozens of Americans were taken hostage for 444 days. This year, it paraded its ballistic missiles in front of the former U.S. Embassy in Tehran. With chants of "Death to America," the disdain for international norms and the nuclear deal came through loud and clear.
But that image does not represent Iran.
Today, the average Iranian citizen longs for friendship and mutually beneficial ties with the outside world, particularly the United States. In 1979, it was not only Americans taken hostage by a medieval theocratic order; the Iranian people were also taken hostage and held captive after their democratic revolution was usurped by Khomeini.
Decades later, the prospects of change in Iran are closer and more viable than ever. Internal conditions are conducive to a fundamental sociopolitical transformation, and the Iranian people are rising up and demanding democracy.
At least three distinct but interrelated factors accentuate the prospects for change:First, the internal dynamics: The mullahs’ systemic, pervasive mismanagement of the economy has left the Iranian people's basic rights and demands unaddressed and out of reach. The "army of the unemployed," a devalued currency, inflation and corruption are tied to a host of social ills like prostitution, drug abuse and suicides.
Many thousands have been literally robbed of their life savings after regime-affiliated financial institutions, free from accountability and regulations, defrauded them. These companies are tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), supreme leader Ali Khamenei's office and the State Security Forces (SSF).
These people are now staging mass protests in cities across Iran, including Tehran. Every day, thousands pour into the streets to protest economic misconduct and injustices.

The regime is clearly frightened. Last month, tens of thousands of people sought to stage a gathering to commemorate the birth of Persian King Cyrus the Great (known for his respect for human rights and freedom of expression).

The regime arrayed all its forces to stop it. A number of the most senior IRGC commanders were hurriedly deployed to the Tomb of Cyrus. No less than 6,000 IRGC and SSF forces were stationed there to prevent protests.

The second important factor for change is the regime’s loss of the all-important backing of the U.S. Sadly, the Obama administration went out of its way to cajole and appease the "Islamic Republic government" for eight years. Now, the new administration, rightly calling Tehran a "dictatorship,” has afforded due respect for the Iranian people, not their murderers.

The decision to step up restrictions on the regime, including placing the IRGC on the terrorist list and imposing new Treasury sanctions, marks an important departure for U.S. policy. The IRGC has long been the regime’s backbone, controlling its security and suppression apparatus while increasing its dominance over the Iranian economy.

The Treasury Department's sanctions are a necessary step in dealing with the regime's suppression, terrorism and ballistic missile programs. However, they need to be extended to individuals, companies and entities affiliated with the IRGC, as well as to the IRGC's foreign proxies.

Today, IRGC commanders stationed in 31 provinces throughout Iran are responsible for cracking down on protests and peaceful assembly. These individuals should also be placed under sanctions.

Finally, the third element facilitating change is the successful 2016 resettlement of all members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) from their camp in Iraq to Albania. Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Iranian regime had sought to physically eliminate members of this leading opposition movement.

Those plans were foiled, and now the organized nucleus of the opposition has been re-energized, boosting its strength and cohesiveness.

The growing social unrest inside Iran, Washington’s increasing restrictions on the mullahs and the strengthening of the organized opposition capable of leading popular discontent toward the overthrow of the regime, are critical factors for change.

The time has come for the world to see the true image of Iran; one that rejects hostage-taking and terrorism and instead champions a non-nuclear, democratic and secular republic that respects human rights, gender equality and free-market economics.

Democratic change in Iran is not just necessary, it is also within reach, thanks to decades of relentless struggle and perseverance by the Iranian people and their organized opposition movement. Like other dictatorships, the mullahs cannot hold back the tides of change indefinitely.

Ali Safavi (@amsafavi) is a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, which is dedicated to the establishment of a democratic, secular and non-nuclear republic in Iran.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The MEK's Religious BeliefsJubin Katiraie

The MEK's Religious BeliefsJubin Katiraie Blog 18 February 2018 The People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) is a political group dedicated to bringing freedom and democracy to Iran. They derive their political beliefs from a modern and tolerant version of Islam that is fully compatible with modern society – the exact opposite of the ruling mullahs’ Sharia Law, which is intolerant, extremist, genocidal, non-democratic, and misogynist – and the MEK believe that their interpretation is the true meaning of Islam. In 1982, MEK leader Massoud Rajavi, said: “The Islam we want is nationalistic, democratic, progressive, and not opposed to science or civilization. We believe there is no contradiction between modern science and true Islam, and we believe that in Islam there must be no compulsion or dictatorship.” This combination of tolerant religion and politics means that the MEK enjoys broad public support amongst the Iranian people and people all over the world, but it is...

European MP Ties to Islamic Republic of Iran Saturday

European MP Ties to Islamic Republic of Iran Saturday, 03 March 2018 08:29 Ana Gomes, MEP and Josef Weidenholzer By David N. Neumann After lashing out against opponents of the Islamic Republic of Iran in several parliamentary debates, a member of the European Parliament has admitted to doing the bidding of Tehran. In a meeting in Brussels, Portuguese socialist MEP Ana Gomes acknowledged that she had been instructed in Tehran to bash the Iranian opposition. “I met with relatives of the victims of a terrorist organisation called MEK,” she said on her visit to Tehran in a meeting of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee on 22 February 2018. After making a number of allegations about the Iranian opposition movement PMOI or MEK, she added: “We cannot continue to allow some members of this parliament, possibly out of naiveté, to continue to abet some of the members of this organization.” Her claims are particularly surprising, given that competent European and American court...

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria05 March 2018 Iran Focus London, 05 Mar - The French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, has arrived in Iran to talk with the country's president Hassan Rouhani, Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and the Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, according to Iranian state TV. Talks are expected to focus on Iran’s involvement in the Syrian Civil war and Iran's ballistic missile program, which both Le Drian and French President Emmanuel Macron have criticized Iran's missile program in recent weeks, with Le Drian stating that Iran's ballistic missile capacity worried France “enormously". In response to Iranian claims that their ballistic missile program is peaceful, Le Drian said: "Having such tools is not uniquely defensive, given the distance they can reach." The French Foreign Ministry even issued a statement ahead of the trip, which said Le Drian ...