Skip to main content
Iran Deal Should Have Addressed Terrorism ConcernsNuclear 09 November 2017

Iran Focus
London, 9 Nov - Last week, the CIA released nearly half a million al-Qaeda documents that had been seized during the 2011 Navy SEAL raid on Osama bin Laden’s Pakistan compound; many documenting the clear link between the terrorist cell and the Iranian Regime.
The 2011 mission, hailed as a success for eliminating Bin Laden and the uncovering of an incredible amount of intelligence on the terrorist group, is now being heavily questioned because the US failed to address the highly concerning relationship between Iran and terrorism before the 2015 nuclear deal was put in place.
At the time, the US released just a few hundred of the over 470,000 files. While the vast majority contained no national security concerns, many were classified as they contained intelligence about al-Qaida and its allies, including Iran.While Steven F. Hayes at the Weekly Standard argues that these should have been released because al-Qaida already knew that the documents would have been taken during that raid and the US wouldn’t be revealing its hand, there is no real point in revealing information to the public about terrorist activity that might have taken place if the plans hadn’t been uncovered and al-Qaida wasn't forced to adjust their plans. That would only increase public fear.
However, it is unnerving that in 2015, the US and five other world powers (the UK, France, Germany, Russia, and China) would agree on a nuclear deal that didn’t address Iran’s clear links to one of the world’s most-feared terrorist groups.

The Iranian Regime provided funding and training to al-Qaida in the early 1990s, teaching them how to launch terror attacks that would later lead to the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.

In the lead up to 9/11, the Iranian Regime allowed al-Qaida members to travel across their borders several times with no (or false) documentation. Then, after the US invasion of Afghanistan, the Regime sheltered high-ranking al-Qaida members from the authorities. It is believed that the Regime wanted to bribe the US into stopping protection on Iranian Resistance members in Iraq but the US refused to.

All of this was in one 19-page report found in the raid, while another letter described Iran as the “main artery” for al-Qaida.

How then could the US- and the other world powers if they knew- justify not addressing the Iranian Regime’s links to terrorism in the nuclear deal? The Iranian Regime would hardly end its support for terrorism based on the death of one terrorist leader.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria05 March 2018 Iran Focus London, 05 Mar - The French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, has arrived in Iran to talk with the country's president Hassan Rouhani, Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and the Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, according to Iranian state TV. Talks are expected to focus on Iran’s involvement in the Syrian Civil war and Iran's ballistic missile program, which both Le Drian and French President Emmanuel Macron have criticized Iran's missile program in recent weeks, with Le Drian stating that Iran's ballistic missile capacity worried France “enormously". In response to Iranian claims that their ballistic missile program is peaceful, Le Drian said: "Having such tools is not uniquely defensive, given the distance they can reach." The French Foreign Ministry even issued a statement ahead of the trip, which said Le Drian ...
WE SHOULD LISTEN CLOSELY TO IRAN Created: 26 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Human rights Protests United States Opinion JCPOA Paris Middle East Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei (Photo by Supreme Leader Press Office / Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) By Heshmat Alavi As the world continues to debate the recent Iranian outburst of protests, its "lack of leadership" as they claim, and the road ahead, there is no doubt in the minds of senior Iranian regime officials over who led, and continues to lead, this latest uprising that continues to rattle the very pillars of the mullahs' rule.Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made his thoughts crystal clear.“The incidents were organized” and carried out by the Iranian opposition People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), he said although using a different term. “The [MEK] had prepared for this months ago” and “the [MEK’s] media outlets had called for it.” The MEK is best known ...
Let’s Get Real: There Are No ‘Moderates’ In Iran’s Government That U.S. intelligence agencies’ latest threat assessment views Iran’s leadership according to the moderate-hardliner split. That defies logic. By Ben Weingarten FEBRUARY 23, 2018 If Iran is the most prominent state sponsor of terrorism in the world, can its president be called a “centrist?” What about if under that president Iran has become the world’s leading executioner of all people per capita, and of women and children on an absolute basis? Does a president termed the “Diplomatic Sheikh,” a man who brags about deceiving the West in negotiations to buy time to advance Iran’s nuclear program; who describes such diplomatic engagement as “ jihad ;” and who calls for still more “ jihad and resistance ” against Israel while pointing 250,000 rockets at it , strike you as “centrist?” If that president served for 40 years at the highest levels of the Islamic revolutionary regime as the first official following the overthrow ...