Skip to main content

Iran: The Fight for SinjarIran and Its Neighbours 17 November 2017
Iran Focus
London, 17 Nov - Sinjar in Iraq is proving to be a very wanted area. PKK (the Kurdistan Workers Party), Turkey and Iran all have their eyes on this area because it is strategically important to each of them, but in different ways.
Turkey is bombing all PKK positions to gain control over its strongholds. The country’s President said at the beginning of November that unless the authorities resolve the issues in Qandil and Sinjar, Turkey would “raze those places to the ground”. Turkey sees the PKK as a terrorist organisation, as does the European Union and the United States.The Yazidis, a Kurdish religious minority, live in Sinjar. The town is located near the Syrian border in northeast of Iraq. Turkey wants the area because the PKK refused to leave after getting there in 2014 to fight IS and to defend the Yazidis despite strong reactions from the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and Turkey.

Iran’s interest in the area became evident earlier this year when the Iranian-backed Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) turned up and attempted to take over villages that are controlled by the Sinjar Resistance Units (the Yazidi forces).

The PMU were instrumental in getting control of Kirkuk from the KRG. The PMU, according to the local Kurds, are mostly Iranian soldiers.

However, one wonders why Iran has such an interest in Sinjar in the absence of ethnic and religious links. Well, it all points to Iran’s Shiite crescent goals. Iran wants its land route to the Mediterranean and to secure itself against regional rival Israel. Getting Sinjar is a vital stop in its line that goes through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon and it will also help to sever all ties with the Kurds.

Tehran is also working on strengthening itself so that it can be a deterrent. However, Iran is unlikely to engage in war. Well, not a direct war in any case.

It could also be said that if Iran obtains the corridor it is after, Turkey will be threatened by this. There are doubts about whether Turkey could control Sinjar, but this is not Turkey’s priority – it just wants to make sure that Iran doesn’t gain control.

As well as being a strategic location for its land corridor, Iran also wants Sinjar because it has Sunni areas. Having control of Sinjar means that Iran can keep them under observation. Iran fears that the Sunnis will gain strength, especially when they have the support of Turkey.

Severing ties between the Sunnis in Iraq and the Sunnis in Syria could be done via border control.

Tensions between Iran and Turkey were heightened because of their differences with regards to the civil war in Syria, but when the issue became a Kurdish one they found themselves on the same side. The two countries have been in competition with each other for hundreds of years are finding it impossible to come to a solution that would suit each party.

They will be involved in a confrontation together – maybe not a military one, but certainly a political one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria05 March 2018 Iran Focus London, 05 Mar - The French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, has arrived in Iran to talk with the country's president Hassan Rouhani, Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and the Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, according to Iranian state TV. Talks are expected to focus on Iran’s involvement in the Syrian Civil war and Iran's ballistic missile program, which both Le Drian and French President Emmanuel Macron have criticized Iran's missile program in recent weeks, with Le Drian stating that Iran's ballistic missile capacity worried France “enormously". In response to Iranian claims that their ballistic missile program is peaceful, Le Drian said: "Having such tools is not uniquely defensive, given the distance they can reach." The French Foreign Ministry even issued a statement ahead of the trip, which said Le Drian ...
WE SHOULD LISTEN CLOSELY TO IRAN Created: 26 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Human rights Protests United States Opinion JCPOA Paris Middle East Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei (Photo by Supreme Leader Press Office / Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) By Heshmat Alavi As the world continues to debate the recent Iranian outburst of protests, its "lack of leadership" as they claim, and the road ahead, there is no doubt in the minds of senior Iranian regime officials over who led, and continues to lead, this latest uprising that continues to rattle the very pillars of the mullahs' rule.Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made his thoughts crystal clear.“The incidents were organized” and carried out by the Iranian opposition People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), he said although using a different term. “The [MEK] had prepared for this months ago” and “the [MEK’s] media outlets had called for it.” The MEK is best known ...
Let’s Get Real: There Are No ‘Moderates’ In Iran’s Government That U.S. intelligence agencies’ latest threat assessment views Iran’s leadership according to the moderate-hardliner split. That defies logic. By Ben Weingarten FEBRUARY 23, 2018 If Iran is the most prominent state sponsor of terrorism in the world, can its president be called a “centrist?” What about if under that president Iran has become the world’s leading executioner of all people per capita, and of women and children on an absolute basis? Does a president termed the “Diplomatic Sheikh,” a man who brags about deceiving the West in negotiations to buy time to advance Iran’s nuclear program; who describes such diplomatic engagement as “ jihad ;” and who calls for still more “ jihad and resistance ” against Israel while pointing 250,000 rockets at it , strike you as “centrist?” If that president served for 40 years at the highest levels of the Islamic revolutionary regime as the first official following the overthrow ...