THE END OF THE MIRAGE OF MODERATION IN IRAN Created: 28 January 2018
Iran
Freedom
Protests
Political Prisoner
United States
Europe
Iranian Youths
Free Iran
By Mahdavi nasim
In 2009, when Iranian youth took to the streets and called for the overthrow of the rule of the mullahs, many European countries, including the United States, were reluctant to support the Iranian people, they were still looking for the reform from inside of the regime. Was this regime really capable of reform?
No, that was just an illusion because so-called reformists took the office for 20 years out of the 38 years of the regime’s ruling lifetime, and they accomplished nothing but serving the survival of the Velayat-e Faqih regime.
In the beginning of 2018, when the Iranian people poured into streets, demanding regime change, one of their favorite slogans in Tehran was: “Hard-liners, Reformists, the game is over.” This slogan was a clear sign that Iranian people do not believe in reform from inside the regime and what they desire is the mullahs' regime overthrown in its entirety.
The recent demonstrations in Iran sent a clear message to the Westerners and those who have a dream of reconciliation between the regime and the West, which is, the mullah’s regime is founded on shaky bases, and the Iranian people are determined in their struggle to undermine it. The slogans against velayat-e-Faqih called for a real Republic based on democracy and targeted the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei and his president, Hassan Rouhani.
It was a clear message over the end of a myth that is still followed by some governments, pretending that Iranian people distinguish between so-called moderates and hard-liners in Iran. The Iranian protests have also undermined the imagination of stability of the Cleric regime in Iran.
The chants of “Death to Hezbollah” and “Leave Syria, think about us instead” clearly proved the people’s opposition to the regime’s belligerent regional schemes.
Now the question is, whether nonstop offering concessions to this regime have changed its behavior and if it is possible to contain this regime and compel it to halt destabilizing activities. The answer is, not absolutely.
As a matter of fact, the U.S. and the European governments have experienced these fruitless guidelines again and again over the last decades, calling it the Policy Changing Behaviors or Policy of Containment and so on. The vain policies with no effective results except hindering to adopt a realistic, decisive policy against the mullah’s regime.
Therefore, the solution, the sole solution, is what the Iranian Resistance has emphasized since years ago and many people in the world have reached today which is “regime change in Iran.”
Finally, the recent uprising will succeed in overthrowing the theocrat dictatorship in Iran and the people of Iran are determined to do that.
Iran
Freedom
Protests
Political Prisoner
United States
Europe
Iranian Youths
Free Iran
By Mahdavi nasim
In 2009, when Iranian youth took to the streets and called for the overthrow of the rule of the mullahs, many European countries, including the United States, were reluctant to support the Iranian people, they were still looking for the reform from inside of the regime. Was this regime really capable of reform?
No, that was just an illusion because so-called reformists took the office for 20 years out of the 38 years of the regime’s ruling lifetime, and they accomplished nothing but serving the survival of the Velayat-e Faqih regime.
In the beginning of 2018, when the Iranian people poured into streets, demanding regime change, one of their favorite slogans in Tehran was: “Hard-liners, Reformists, the game is over.” This slogan was a clear sign that Iranian people do not believe in reform from inside the regime and what they desire is the mullahs' regime overthrown in its entirety.
The recent demonstrations in Iran sent a clear message to the Westerners and those who have a dream of reconciliation between the regime and the West, which is, the mullah’s regime is founded on shaky bases, and the Iranian people are determined in their struggle to undermine it. The slogans against velayat-e-Faqih called for a real Republic based on democracy and targeted the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei and his president, Hassan Rouhani.
It was a clear message over the end of a myth that is still followed by some governments, pretending that Iranian people distinguish between so-called moderates and hard-liners in Iran. The Iranian protests have also undermined the imagination of stability of the Cleric regime in Iran.
The chants of “Death to Hezbollah” and “Leave Syria, think about us instead” clearly proved the people’s opposition to the regime’s belligerent regional schemes.
Now the question is, whether nonstop offering concessions to this regime have changed its behavior and if it is possible to contain this regime and compel it to halt destabilizing activities. The answer is, not absolutely.
As a matter of fact, the U.S. and the European governments have experienced these fruitless guidelines again and again over the last decades, calling it the Policy Changing Behaviors or Policy of Containment and so on. The vain policies with no effective results except hindering to adopt a realistic, decisive policy against the mullah’s regime.
Therefore, the solution, the sole solution, is what the Iranian Resistance has emphasized since years ago and many people in the world have reached today which is “regime change in Iran.”
Finally, the recent uprising will succeed in overthrowing the theocrat dictatorship in Iran and the people of Iran are determined to do that.
Comments
Post a Comment