Skip to main content
Trump's Decertification of the Iran Deal May Improve US CredibilityNuclear 23 October 2017

Iran Focus
London, 23 Oct - While some are painting the idea that Donald Trump’s actions over the Iranian nuclear deal will harm US credibility abroad, many others believe that this will actually improve US credibility.
Richard Goldberg, one of the leading architects of several rounds of congressionally enacted sanctions on Iran, wrote on the New York Post:” President Trump’s decision to decertify the pact offers an opportunity to rebuild the credibility lost when President Barack Obama instituted his policy of appeasement of Iran and Russia.”
Back in 2008, then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, flew to the Czech Republic and Poland to agree on the locations of American missile defence radars and interceptors that would be able to intercept future Iranian long-range ballistic missiles.
It was the policy of the George W. Bush administration to defend US allies against Iranian missile strikes.Russia, led by Vladimir Putin, didn’t see it that way. They saw it as an attempt by the US to expand its sphere of influence into territory near Russia and threated to respond with “military-technical methods” if the missile-defence pact moved forward.
Even after Russia’s invasion of Georgia, the Bush administration didn’t back down; instead showing strength to both Russia and Iran while reassuring its Middle Eastern and Eastern European allies.
However, these agreements didn’t last in Obama’s term in office.
During his first year in office, Obama scrapped these pacts just months after refusing to support the Iranian people’s cry for regime change following the fake 2009 elections.
This meant that Russia and Iran saw the US as weak and as a result amped up its campaigns against the US. In response, the 2015 Iran nuclear deal was signed, giving billions to the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism in exchange for a short delay in Iranian development of nuclear weapons. That’s if you believe that the Iranian Regime ever stopped their nuclear programme because much evidence shows that they did not.
Trump has now decertified the much-criticised Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), and is receiving criticism from those who supported the deal.
It is now up to Congress to decide the next steps; should sanctions be reintroduced or should the deal be renegotiated. It is time to wait and see.
Goldberg wrote: “Compared to ripping up a signed defence pact with key European allies, renegotiating an unsigned “plan of action” that currently threatens US national security sounds like a sensible idea.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria

French FM Visits Iran to Talk Ballistic Missiles and Syria05 March 2018 Iran Focus London, 05 Mar - The French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, has arrived in Iran to talk with the country's president Hassan Rouhani, Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and the Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, according to Iranian state TV. Talks are expected to focus on Iran’s involvement in the Syrian Civil war and Iran's ballistic missile program, which both Le Drian and French President Emmanuel Macron have criticized Iran's missile program in recent weeks, with Le Drian stating that Iran's ballistic missile capacity worried France “enormously". In response to Iranian claims that their ballistic missile program is peaceful, Le Drian said: "Having such tools is not uniquely defensive, given the distance they can reach." The French Foreign Ministry even issued a statement ahead of the trip, which said Le Drian ...
WE SHOULD LISTEN CLOSELY TO IRAN Created: 26 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Human rights Protests United States Opinion JCPOA Paris Middle East Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei (Photo by Supreme Leader Press Office / Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) By Heshmat Alavi As the world continues to debate the recent Iranian outburst of protests, its "lack of leadership" as they claim, and the road ahead, there is no doubt in the minds of senior Iranian regime officials over who led, and continues to lead, this latest uprising that continues to rattle the very pillars of the mullahs' rule.Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made his thoughts crystal clear.“The incidents were organized” and carried out by the Iranian opposition People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), he said although using a different term. “The [MEK] had prepared for this months ago” and “the [MEK’s] media outlets had called for it.” The MEK is best known ...
Let’s Get Real: There Are No ‘Moderates’ In Iran’s Government That U.S. intelligence agencies’ latest threat assessment views Iran’s leadership according to the moderate-hardliner split. That defies logic. By Ben Weingarten FEBRUARY 23, 2018 If Iran is the most prominent state sponsor of terrorism in the world, can its president be called a “centrist?” What about if under that president Iran has become the world’s leading executioner of all people per capita, and of women and children on an absolute basis? Does a president termed the “Diplomatic Sheikh,” a man who brags about deceiving the West in negotiations to buy time to advance Iran’s nuclear program; who describes such diplomatic engagement as “ jihad ;” and who calls for still more “ jihad and resistance ” against Israel while pointing 250,000 rockets at it , strike you as “centrist?” If that president served for 40 years at the highest levels of the Islamic revolutionary regime as the first official following the overthrow ...