Skip to main content
The Iran Nuclear Deal Is CollapsingNuclear 30 October 2017

Iran Focus
London, 30 Oct - A little over two weeks ago, Donald Trump decertified Iranian compliance with the 2015 Nuclear Deal, which was supposed to impose strict limits on the rogue state’s nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.
Now Congress must decide whether or not to reimpose sanctions waived under the nuclear deal by mid-December.
The hope for the deal, signed by the permanent members of the UN Security Council (the US, UK, Russia, France and China) plus Germany, were high. Iran would give up its nuclear programme in order to obtain sanctions relief and then be slowly convinced through interaction with other countries to dispose of its other troubling behaviours, like support for terrorism and destabilisation of fellow nation states.
Unfortunately, the deal was flawed.The Iranian Regime was supposed to allow international inspectors to access their sites in order to verify compliance but they blockaded the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors at every turn.
It also allowed over $1.5 billion in frozen assets to be transferred to the Iranian Regime, which they then used for military expansion and international armed conflicts in Syria, Iraq and Yemen.
Thankfully, a clause in the nuclear deal, otherwise known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), for the US required the President to certify Iran’s compliance with the deal to Congress every 90 days and it is this power that Trump exercised in mid-October.
Trump, a vocal critic of the deal on his campaign trail, said that Iran was violating the “spirit” of the deal.
Although he had twice already this year certified Iran as compliant, many knew that it would not happen a third time as evidenced by the heated war of words between Trump and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York in September.
There Rouhani said that Trump was looking for an excuse to pull out of the deal, while Trump cited numerous violations of the deal by Iran.
It didn’t help that during the UNGA Iran also reported launching a new ballistic missile that can carry multiple warheads and can travel up to 2,000 kilometres.
If Congress does reimpose all economic sanctions against Iran, it would block the Iranian Regime from accessing most international trade and finance including billions of dollars in oil revenue and assets.
Many analysts predict a bleak future for Iran under harsh economic sanctions, in the same way that North Korea is financially restricted by international sanctions.
The President of Facts Global Energy (FGE) consultancy, Jeff Brown, said that these sanctions could work even if the US had to go it alone.
He said that during the previous sanctions period, the US cut off roughly one million barrels per day of crude oil supplies and most of Iran’s oil trade finance.
It is unlikely that Trump’s decertification will affect the Regime in the weeks to come but further down the road, they will face big problems with investment and technologies and service providers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iran-Back Hezbollah Controls LebanonTerrorism

Iran-Back Hezbollah Controls LebanonTerrorism 21 February 2018 Iran Focus London, 21 Feb - In recent years, when the US has made statements against Iran-backed Hezbollah, they have often followed this up with support for the Lebanese army and security forces, but it is becoming increasingly clear that there is little, if any, distinction between the Lebanese state and the Iran-backed terrorist group. When US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arrived in Beirut, last Thursday, Hezbollah had created two new problems with Israel: a southern border wall and the debates over oil and gas extraction. This caused Tillerson to make the US position on Hezbollah very clear. Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation with no difference between its military and political wings. He advised that Hezbollah and Iran were creating tensions in the region in order to destabilise the Middle East. Iran seeks the destruction to distract others from its own problems, both domestic and international. It not only ta...
Iran-Backed Hezbollah Accuses Saudi Arabia of Arresting Lebanon Prime Minister10 November 2017 Iran Focus London, 10 Nov - The Secretary-General of the Iran-backed Hezbollah terrorist group is blaming Saudi Arabia for the shock resignation of Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri this weekend with no actual evidence to back up his claims. Hassan Nasrallah claimed that Hariri has been arrested in Riyadh, even claiming to be seriously worried about Hariri’s safety and calling upon Saudi Arabia to “give us back our prime minister”. This is, of course, designed to detract attention from the reasons that Hariri actually gave for his resignation in a speech on Saturday from Saudi Arabia. Hariri said that he feared that the Iranian Regime and Hezbollah were going to assassinate him, as they did to his father in 2005, when under the orders of Mustafa Badr al-Din.
REGIME IS SCARED OF THE MEK’S POPULARITY IN IRAN Created: 25 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Protests United States Inside Iran IRGC Demonstration People of Iran Maryam Rajavi's poster hanged in Tehran Make no mistake, the Iranian Regime is absolutely terrified of not just the Iranian people, but also the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK). This fear can be seen in the pro-regime protests that the mullahs organized, where paid protesters held signs like “Green Movement is supporter of Rajavi”, and in the many comments from Regime leaders themselves. It seems like even the Iranian Regime is being forced to admit that the Iranian Resistance is incredibly popular amongst the Iranian people. In early January, Supreme Leder Ali Khamenei said that the protest had been organized by the MEK months ago. He was trying to imply that the Iranian people had been manipulated by enemies of the Regime- apparently forgetting that the Iranian people are enemies of the Regim...