Skip to main content

IRAN DEAL: FINDING A BETTER STRATEGY MUST ADDRESS IRAN'S DARK HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD TOO

 
 IJR Opinion is an opinion platform and any opinions or information put forth by contributors are exclusive to them and do not represent the views of IJR.While President Donald Trump's intention to not certify the Iran nuclear agreement is on the minds of many Iranians, it's not their only worry.Countless Iranians, especially religious and ethnic minorities,
wonder when they will see their imprisoned relatives, when they will get some form of justice for the cousin who was hanged, or the uncle whose limbs were cut off as punishment. They wonder when they will be able not just to live without fear of nuclear war, but also without fear of being lashed by the vice police.

For the vast majority of Iranians, the nuclear deal has underscored a more basic question: when will the U.S. stand up for those values for which it is admired, including in Iran?
Each publicly televised launch of a ballistic missile violates the spirit of the deal and moves Iran closer to the ability to launch an intercontinental nuclear strike. Each military site that remains uninspected, aggressive interference abroad overlooked, or political killing ignored, further convinces the repressive rulers of Iran that they can continue their rule with impunity.
There must be a price to pay if the Iranian regime launches ballistic missiles or continues its egregious and destabilizing activities in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and elsewhere. Reinstating sanctions instead of rewarding the regime with business deals makes adherence more likely.
A deal that penalizes Iran for bad behavior also sends an important message to the Iranian people, as well as the peoples in the region terrorized by the regime: America is with you if you are deprived of your rights and seek democracy and justice.
Many laud Iranians' resolve and commitment to freedom. For almost four decades, the regime has stayed in power via crackdowns and mass murder; that certainly ensures anger bubbling just beneath the surface. That anger has surfaced again and again, each time to be put down only by brute force.
The clerical rulers have raped, tortured, and murdered their own people every year since 1981, when they monopolized power after the 1979 revolution. They routinely execute juvenile offenders or women defending themselves against assault. Twenty-seven-year-old Reyhaneh Jabbari was hanged in 2014 for killing an Intelligence Ministry official allegedly attempting to abuse her.
In the summer of 1988, the regime murdered thousands of political prisoners, most of them activists of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), only because they remained steadfast in opposing the regime. The architects of the 1988 massacre now hold senior government positions.
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his gang of murderous thugs fear nothing more than the Iranian people, which explains why the death penalty rate under the supposed “moderates” currently in power is one of the highest in the world. There are few Iranians not connected in some way to someone that the regime has brutalized, and that has consequences.
Enter the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which acts as the parliament-in-exile and is led by a woman, Maryam Rajavi. The NCRI includes the MEK, whose members risk life and limb for freedom, have provided vital intelligence on Iran's nuclear program, and have exposed its crimes against humanity, including the 1988 massacre.
President Trump has announced that he will adopt a new policy on Iran. That new approach should not only act to ensure that the Iranian regime does not acquire a nuclear bomb, but also to significantly hamper its aggressive behavior in the region.
As part of this, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) must not be allowed any presence in countries in the region. The IRGC is the regime's instrument of chaos, instability, and sectarian violence. Treating the IRGC as a terrorist organization would send a strong signal to the people of Iran and the region.
Ultimately, any new approach should be based on the understanding that neither the region nor the world will be secure so long as the Iranian regime is in power. And it should recognize the inherent instability of a regime forced to suppress 11,000 anti-government protest acts all over Iran in the past year.
The Iranian people have taken a stand, and the United States would do well to stand on their side while recognizing their right to struggle for fundamental change.
originally published on the   ijr.com
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iran-Back Hezbollah Controls LebanonTerrorism

Iran-Back Hezbollah Controls LebanonTerrorism 21 February 2018 Iran Focus London, 21 Feb - In recent years, when the US has made statements against Iran-backed Hezbollah, they have often followed this up with support for the Lebanese army and security forces, but it is becoming increasingly clear that there is little, if any, distinction between the Lebanese state and the Iran-backed terrorist group. When US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arrived in Beirut, last Thursday, Hezbollah had created two new problems with Israel: a southern border wall and the debates over oil and gas extraction. This caused Tillerson to make the US position on Hezbollah very clear. Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation with no difference between its military and political wings. He advised that Hezbollah and Iran were creating tensions in the region in order to destabilise the Middle East. Iran seeks the destruction to distract others from its own problems, both domestic and international. It not only ta...
Post a Comment
Read more
Iran-Backed Hezbollah Accuses Saudi Arabia of Arresting Lebanon Prime Minister10 November 2017 Iran Focus London, 10 Nov - The Secretary-General of the Iran-backed Hezbollah terrorist group is blaming Saudi Arabia for the shock resignation of Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri this weekend with no actual evidence to back up his claims. Hassan Nasrallah claimed that Hariri has been arrested in Riyadh, even claiming to be seriously worried about Hariri’s safety and calling upon Saudi Arabia to “give us back our prime minister”. This is, of course, designed to detract attention from the reasons that Hariri actually gave for his resignation in a speech on Saturday from Saudi Arabia. Hariri said that he feared that the Iranian Regime and Hezbollah were going to assassinate him, as they did to his father in 2005, when under the orders of Mustafa Badr al-Din.
Post a Comment
Read more
REGIME IS SCARED OF THE MEK’S POPULARITY IN IRAN Created: 25 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Protests United States Inside Iran IRGC Demonstration People of Iran Maryam Rajavi's poster hanged in Tehran Make no mistake, the Iranian Regime is absolutely terrified of not just the Iranian people, but also the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK). This fear can be seen in the pro-regime protests that the mullahs organized, where paid protesters held signs like “Green Movement is supporter of Rajavi”, and in the many comments from Regime leaders themselves. It seems like even the Iranian Regime is being forced to admit that the Iranian Resistance is incredibly popular amongst the Iranian people. In early January, Supreme Leder Ali Khamenei said that the protest had been organized by the MEK months ago. He was trying to imply that the Iranian people had been manipulated by enemies of the Regime- apparently forgetting that the Iranian people are enemies of the Regim...
Post a Comment
Read more