Skip to main content

Iran's Blocking of OPEC Agreement Still Leaves Options for Saudi Arabia18 June 2018

Iran's Blocking of OPEC Agreement Still Leaves Options for Saudi Arabia18 June 2018


Iran Focus
London, 18 Jun - Many have been saying that Iran is putting Saudi Arabia in a position where it cannot act. However, this is not true. There are a number of possibilities still open to Saudi Arabia even if Iran does go ahead and block an increase in OPEC's oil production.
Iran is threatening to veto any proposal for more OPEC output and claims that it has the support of Venezuela and Iraq. Both Saudi Arabia and Russia are keen for output to be increased.
OPEC's representative from Iran - Hossein Kazempour Ardebili - said yesterday that if Russia and Saudi Arabia want the production to increase, it must have unanimity.
The group is due to meet at the end of the week in Austria.
According to the statute of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, it is true that any deal can be blocked by any member. The text states: “Each Full Member Country shall have one vote. All decisions of the Conference, other than on procedural matters, shall require the unanimous agreement of all Full Members.”
This does not mean that Saudi Arabia has to sit back and accept the decision made by Iran. It can still get past the veto.
A similar situation happened almost 20 years ago when a Saudi-backed plan to boost output was rejected by the Islamic Republic. (As a result of this incident, Saudi Arabia and eight other countries joined together and issued the OPEC-9 communique that did not include Iraq or the Islamic Republic.)

This is the option that is still open to Saudi Arabia today. All it has to do its block any group-wide communique and then gather supporters within OPEC. This new coalition would then be able to outline a fresh policy with regards to production.

However, Saudi Arabia risks isolation if it takes this route. Especially if it does not get further backing from the other members of the OPEC. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait are its two main supporters within the group, but unless it has further support, it is unlikely to issue a communique in fear of looking weak.

Therefore, Saudi Arabia, like it did in 2011, could just omit to issue a communique altogether. In 2011, Saudi Arabia decided to unilaterally set its own policy after Oil Minister Ali Al-Naimi walked out of the meeting, declaring it one of the “worst” that had ever taken place.

Saudi Arabia could also forget about a formal increase in production but be creative with its output quotas. Saudi Arabia, however, has been very strict about adhering to the agreements and the oil minister is unlikely to agree to such action, even thought it is somewhat of a tradition with the OPEC.

Furthermore, the 2016 deal that played a big part in the oil prices doubling would no doubt lead to the disintegration of the agreement if Saudi Arabia bypasses a veto. Iran’s OPEC representative warned Saudi Arabia and Russia that if the two countries were to act alone it would be “a breach of the cooperation agreement”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iran-Back Hezbollah Controls LebanonTerrorism

Iran-Back Hezbollah Controls LebanonTerrorism 21 February 2018 Iran Focus London, 21 Feb - In recent years, when the US has made statements against Iran-backed Hezbollah, they have often followed this up with support for the Lebanese army and security forces, but it is becoming increasingly clear that there is little, if any, distinction between the Lebanese state and the Iran-backed terrorist group. When US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arrived in Beirut, last Thursday, Hezbollah had created two new problems with Israel: a southern border wall and the debates over oil and gas extraction. This caused Tillerson to make the US position on Hezbollah very clear. Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation with no difference between its military and political wings. He advised that Hezbollah and Iran were creating tensions in the region in order to destabilise the Middle East. Iran seeks the destruction to distract others from its own problems, both domestic and international. It not only ta...
Iran-Backed Hezbollah Accuses Saudi Arabia of Arresting Lebanon Prime Minister10 November 2017 Iran Focus London, 10 Nov - The Secretary-General of the Iran-backed Hezbollah terrorist group is blaming Saudi Arabia for the shock resignation of Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri this weekend with no actual evidence to back up his claims. Hassan Nasrallah claimed that Hariri has been arrested in Riyadh, even claiming to be seriously worried about Hariri’s safety and calling upon Saudi Arabia to “give us back our prime minister”. This is, of course, designed to detract attention from the reasons that Hariri actually gave for his resignation in a speech on Saturday from Saudi Arabia. Hariri said that he feared that the Iranian Regime and Hezbollah were going to assassinate him, as they did to his father in 2005, when under the orders of Mustafa Badr al-Din.
REGIME IS SCARED OF THE MEK’S POPULARITY IN IRAN Created: 25 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Protests United States Inside Iran IRGC Demonstration People of Iran Maryam Rajavi's poster hanged in Tehran Make no mistake, the Iranian Regime is absolutely terrified of not just the Iranian people, but also the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK). This fear can be seen in the pro-regime protests that the mullahs organized, where paid protesters held signs like “Green Movement is supporter of Rajavi”, and in the many comments from Regime leaders themselves. It seems like even the Iranian Regime is being forced to admit that the Iranian Resistance is incredibly popular amongst the Iranian people. In early January, Supreme Leder Ali Khamenei said that the protest had been organized by the MEK months ago. He was trying to imply that the Iranian people had been manipulated by enemies of the Regime- apparently forgetting that the Iranian people are enemies of the Regim...