Skip to main content
Total Puts Hold on Iran Deal Ahead of Expected US SanctionsEconomy 16 November 2017

Iran Focus
London, 16 Nov - The French energy giant Total has said that it would have to review its deals with Iran if the US decides to impose new unilateral sanctions on the rogue state because of Total’s assets in the US.
On Monday, November 13, Total’s CEO, Patrick Pouyanne, told CNNMoney’s Emerging Markets: “Either we can do the deal legally if there is a legal framework. If we cannot do that for legal reasons, because of change of regime of sanctions, then we have to revisit it.”
Total was one of the first energy companies to sign an agreement with Iran over South Pars - the world’s largest gas field. Total wants to develop phase 11 of the field as part of a multi-million dollar deal.He continued: “If there is a sanctions regime [on Iran], we have to look at it carefully. We work in the US, we have assets in the US, we just acquired more assets in the US.”
Potential Sanctions
This comes just one month after Donald Trump refused to certify Iranian compliance with the nuclear deal (formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCOPA) and asked Congress to decide whether to reinstate sanctions that were lifted under the 2015 agreement.

Congress has until mid-December to decide whether they will reinstate old sanctions or add in new ones. Trump has also warned that he may yet pull out of the JCPOA altogether.

All of this makes companies very wary about doing business in Iran- with many declining to do business in Iran until the decision has been made- but it shouldn’t just be the risk of US sanctions that stop international investment in Iran.

Funding Fascism

Much of the Iranian economy is controlled by the paramilitary Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) which answers to no one but the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

The majority of so-called private businesses in Iran are actually operated by the IRGC and they funnel the money into their own back pockets or into the Iranian military which means that companies investing in Iran are merely propping up a fascist Regime and are actually funding:

• suppression of the Iranian people (including rising executions, imprisonment of activists, journalists and marginalised groups)

• support for the Bashar-Assad dictatorship in Syria

• the launching of missiles against US allies (as the Iran-backed Houthis recently did to Saudi Arabia)

• the North Korean nuclear missile programme

• support for terrorism worldwide

Is this what these businesses want to fund?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iran-Back Hezbollah Controls LebanonTerrorism

Iran-Back Hezbollah Controls LebanonTerrorism 21 February 2018 Iran Focus London, 21 Feb - In recent years, when the US has made statements against Iran-backed Hezbollah, they have often followed this up with support for the Lebanese army and security forces, but it is becoming increasingly clear that there is little, if any, distinction between the Lebanese state and the Iran-backed terrorist group. When US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arrived in Beirut, last Thursday, Hezbollah had created two new problems with Israel: a southern border wall and the debates over oil and gas extraction. This caused Tillerson to make the US position on Hezbollah very clear. Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation with no difference between its military and political wings. He advised that Hezbollah and Iran were creating tensions in the region in order to destabilise the Middle East. Iran seeks the destruction to distract others from its own problems, both domestic and international. It not only ta...
Iran-Backed Hezbollah Accuses Saudi Arabia of Arresting Lebanon Prime Minister10 November 2017 Iran Focus London, 10 Nov - The Secretary-General of the Iran-backed Hezbollah terrorist group is blaming Saudi Arabia for the shock resignation of Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri this weekend with no actual evidence to back up his claims. Hassan Nasrallah claimed that Hariri has been arrested in Riyadh, even claiming to be seriously worried about Hariri’s safety and calling upon Saudi Arabia to “give us back our prime minister”. This is, of course, designed to detract attention from the reasons that Hariri actually gave for his resignation in a speech on Saturday from Saudi Arabia. Hariri said that he feared that the Iranian Regime and Hezbollah were going to assassinate him, as they did to his father in 2005, when under the orders of Mustafa Badr al-Din.
REGIME IS SCARED OF THE MEK’S POPULARITY IN IRAN Created: 25 January 2018 Iran Maryam Rajavi NCRI PMOI/MEK Protests United States Inside Iran IRGC Demonstration People of Iran Maryam Rajavi's poster hanged in Tehran Make no mistake, the Iranian Regime is absolutely terrified of not just the Iranian people, but also the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK). This fear can be seen in the pro-regime protests that the mullahs organized, where paid protesters held signs like “Green Movement is supporter of Rajavi”, and in the many comments from Regime leaders themselves. It seems like even the Iranian Regime is being forced to admit that the Iranian Resistance is incredibly popular amongst the Iranian people. In early January, Supreme Leder Ali Khamenei said that the protest had been organized by the MEK months ago. He was trying to imply that the Iranian people had been manipulated by enemies of the Regime- apparently forgetting that the Iranian people are enemies of the Regim...